Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 F.2d 236 - United States v. Suarez

United States v. Suarez’s Empirical Analysis

487 F.2d 236 · 1973

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
4
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably United States v. Young (1984), United States v. Thomas A. Warren, John L. Warren, Jr., Des. E. Schick and David Defina (1978)

36 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

27019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Warner · Holder v. United States · Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong · Mason Braswell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida · Causey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure of a witness to comply with the sequestration rule does not of itself render his testimony inadmissible, although it may affect the weight of the testimony; whether such a witness is to be permitted to testify is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the government’s evidence failed to eliminate all reasonable doubt that Chiong’s paper bag contained heroin. Chiong may be guilty, but that is not the standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.