Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California’s Empirical Analysis
487 F.2d 672 · 1973
Citation profile
80 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 137 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno (1990), Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. (1981)
80 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1912 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 2041
Relies on Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad · United States v. Hougham · Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. · Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because that is the date on which the correct judgment should have been entered.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]nterest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court,”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“once a judgment is obtained, interest thereon is mandatory without regard to the elements of which that judgment is composed.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.