Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 F.3d 1024 - United States v. Eversole

United States v. Eversole’s Empirical Analysis

487 F.3d 1024 · 2007

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Peltier (2007), United States v. Villafuerte (2007)

10 federal appellate ·

120200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 858 (§ 417 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Lockett v. Ohio · Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · United States v. Williams · United States v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ll counts involving substantially the same harm shall be grouped together into a single Group.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.