Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 F. Supp. 2d 161 - Boyland v. Wing

487 F. Supp. 2d 161 - Boyland v. Wing’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 2014
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1123 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 8623 · 42 U.S.C. § 8624 · 42 U.S.C. § 8625 · 42 U.S.C. § 8627

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “JOS/Workers must ensure that applicants for Cash Assistance (CA) or participants who pay for heat separately from their rent have fuel allowances included in their CA grants. The correct fuel type and shelter type code must be entered in the Welfare Management System [] budget. This coding will also ensure that HEAP issues the correct amount in the future. In order for the fuel allowance to generate in the CA budget through POS, users must: * click “Yes” in the Shelter (Housing) Expenses window for the question: Do You (Or Anyone Who Lives With You) Have a Heat Bill Separate From Your Rent Or Shelter Expense? Once “Yes” is clicked, a “Response to Question” drop-down window will appear: ... * ensure that all information in the drop-down window is entered regarding the fuel type, account number, and company’s name and address, and click on the OK button.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.