Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 171 · 35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 282
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of no matter of concern during those cartridges' entire existence -beginning after completion of manufacture or assembly and ending with the ultimate destruction, loss, or disappearance of those cartridges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.