Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 MICH 648 - Shay v. Aldrich

Shay v. Aldrich’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A latent ambiguity exists when the language in a contract appears to be clear and intelligible and 'suggests a single meaning, but other facts create the “necessity for interpretation or a choice among two or more possible meanings.” To verify the existence of a latent ambiguity, a court must examine the extrinsic evidence presented and determine if in fact that evidence supports an argument that the contract language at issue, under the circumstances of its forma tion, is susceptible to more than one interpretation. Then, if a latent ambiguity is found to exist, a court must examine the extrinsic evidence again to ascertain the meaning of the contract language at issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'An omission or mistake is not an ambiguity. Parol evidence under the guise of a claimed latent ambiguity is not permissible to vary, add to, or contradict the plainly expressed terms of this writing, or to substitute a different contract for it, to show an intention or purpose not therein expressed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the language in a contract appears to be clear and intelligible and suggests a single meaning, but other facts create the 'necessity for interpretation or a choice among two or more possible meanings.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.