Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 P.2d 47 - Doe v. State

Doe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
10
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 173 W. Va. 387 - State Ex Rel. M.C.H. v. Kinder (1984), P. H. v. State (1972)

2 federal appellate · 88 state decisions — followed in 10 states

400197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Kent v. United States · Alford v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the matter is one of public concern and is recurrent but is capable of evading review,”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We hold that a child has the right to remain free pending an adjudication that the child is delinquent, dependent, or in need of supervision, where the facts supporting the petition involve an act which, if committed by an adult, would be a crime, and where the court has been given reasonable assurance that the child will appear at future court proceedings. If the facts produced at the inquiry show that the child cannot return or remain at home, every effort must be made to place the child in a situation where his freedom will not be curtailed. Only if there is clearly no alternative available may the child be committed to a detention facility and deprived of his freedom.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Rights of Accused. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of twelve, except that the legislature may provide for a jury of not more than twelve nor less th'an six in courts not of record. The accused is entitled to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be released on bail, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.