Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 Pa. 197 - Commonwealth v. Johnson

Commonwealth v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
3
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably Commonwealth v. Genovese (1981), Curley v. State (1984)

93 state decisions

79019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell · Dickey v. Florida · Commonwealth v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We disagree and believe Whitaker is limited to where there is an obvious attempt to evade the requirements of Rule 1100(c) through the use of the nolle prosequi procedure. Here, of course, the termination of the proceeding was not at the request or instigation of the prosecutor, as was the situation in Whitaker.” Id. at 203-204, 409 A.2d at 311 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “These cases only establish that Rule 1100 requires a viable complaint to start its time periods running and that speedy trial considerations do not enter into the case until an effective complaint has been filed. The complaint in this case was unquestionably viable, in fact no subsequent complaint was ever issued.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.