Sides v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Raphan v. United States · 370 So. 2d 1119 - Alderson v. State · 370 So. 2d 1115 - Nix v. State · 476 So. 2d 1236 - Dixon v. State · 462 So. 2d 953 - Ex Parte Troha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““According to the appellant, his conviction is due to be reversed because of Prospective Juror Lane’s comment that T just know he’s in and out of trouble all of the time.’ Contrary to the appellant’s position, however, the prospective juror’s response on voir dire was not ‘per se prejudicial’ to the appellant. For this reason, the trial court’s denial of the request for a mistrial was proper. Thomas v. State, 49 Ala.App. 537, 539 , 274 So.2d 93, 95 (1973).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.