¶1We review Sueiro v. State, 471 So.2d 1317 (Fla.3d DCA 1985), because of direct and express conflict with State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
¶2The district court below held, inter alia, that sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing, but not in effect at the time the offense was committed, could not be applied. We quash the portion of the decision so holding on the authority of Jacksonand remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
¶3It is so ordered.
¶4concurring specially.
¶5I concur because of this Court’s decision in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), but I adhere to the views expressed in my dissent therein.
¶6SHAW, J., concurs.