State v. Parvis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-04-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1987

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Whether Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(i)(4) is applicable to a criminal case wherein the defendant is taken into custody prior to January 1, 1985, 12:01 A.M., the effective date of the above-stated rule.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 502 So. 2d 1245 - State v. Parvis

Relies on 490 So. 2d 92 - McKnight v. Bloom

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-04-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The state appeals an order granting Par-vis’ motion to discharge on speedy trial grounds. We affirm based upon the controlling authority of McKnight v. Bloom, 490 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). We certify to the supreme court, as we did in McKnight, the following question: “Whether Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(i)(4) is applicable to a criminal case wherein the defendant is taken into custody prior to January 1,1985,12:01 A.M., the effective date of the above-stated rule.”

¶2Affirmed.