487 So. 2d 1372 - Roe v. Roe’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1992
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ebert v. Ebert · 406 So. 2d 939 - Thomas v. Thomas · CITICORP, ETC. v. Sanderson · Matthews v. Matthews · 373 So. 2d 845 - Parmer v. Parmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a contempt case this court has a limited scope of review and must affirm the trial court if there is any legal evidence to support its finding. Citicorp Person to Person Financial Center, Inc. v. Sanderson , 421 So.2d 1293 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.