Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

487 So. 2d 31

487 So.2d 31

11 Fla.L.Weekly 73

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 26, 1985

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-12-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2000

4 state decisions

Relies on 478 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Jackson · Sizemore v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-12-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm. the judgment and sentence except as to the assessment of costs. While there is some uncertainty whether contemporaneous objection was required to preserve the primary issue herein for appeal, the trial court did not err. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

¶2As to the trial court’s assessment of costs, we remand with direction to provide appellant the opportunity to object to the assessment prior to reassessment thereof, if any. See Lawson v. State, 470 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.
/487/so2d/31 · .json · Public domain