487 So. 2d 342
487 So.2d 342
11 Fla.L.Weekly 813
Docket 85-1128.
Charles F. WISHART and Bobbie Sue Wishart, Appellants, v. Randall A. BATES and Leslie M. Bates, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-04-02
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1992
5 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“should have been afforded an opportunity to be heard and present evidence at the custody hearing.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 512 So. 2d 977 - Bates v. Wishart
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1986-04-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Charles F. Wishart, Brandon, for appellants.
¶2No appearance for appellees.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4Appellants appeal the denial of their petition for custody of their granddaughter.
¶5The court having reviewed the record finds that appellants should have been afforded an opportunity to be heard and present evidence at the custody hearing.
¶6We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
¶7SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.