Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 SO2D 360 - Rubin v. Brutus Corp.

Rubin v. Brutus Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2010

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

1201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Larsen v. General Motors Corp. · 386 So. 2d 520 - Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. · 354 So. 2d 54 - Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. · 472 So. 2d 1210 - Paterson v. Deeb · Moser v. Texas Trailer Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “General maritime law has usually adopted and followed the principles of general tort law, including products liability doctrines. See generally, 1 Norris, The Law of Maritime Personal Injuries § 175 et seq. (3d ed.1975). For this reason, it is necessary to look to general tort cases for guidance in determining whether the crashworthiness doctrine applies to pleasure boats.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Unless permitted by the Secretary under section 4305 of this title, a State or political subdivision of a State may not establish, continue in effect, or enforce a law or regulation establishing a recreational vessel or associated equipment performance or other safety standard or imposing a requirement for associated equipment 4 (except insofar as the State or political subdivision may, in the absence of the Secretary’s disapproval, regulate the carrying or use of marine safety articles to meet uniquely hazardous conditions or circumstances within the State) that is not identical to a regulation prescribed under section 4302 of this title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Unless permitted by the Secretary under Section 4305 of this title, a State or political subdivision of a State may not establish, continue in effect, or enforce a law or regulation establishing a recreational vessel or associated equipment performance or other safety standard or imposing a requirement for associated equipment ... that is not identical to a regulation prescribed under section 4302 of this title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.