487 So. 2d 424 - Bragg v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 461 So. 2d 109 - Ruffin v. Wainwright · 452 So. 2d 68 - Orantes v. State · 438 So. 2d 72 - Jaffe v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In order to be guilty of conspiring to violate . .. [a criminal] statute it must be proved that appellant agreed with another to commit a criminal offense while intending to commit the offense." Bragg v. State, 487 So.2d 424, 426 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). The state must prove the acts contemplated in the conspiracy would constitute an offense under a Florida statute... . Beke v. State, 423 So.2d 417, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.