Schmidt v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 435 So. 2d 1022 - Holmes v. Christopher · Brown v. Holmes · 351 So. 2d 858 - Williams v. Hanover Ins. Co. of New York · Carlyon v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. · 440 So. 2d 724 - International Matex Tank Terminals v. System Fuels, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule to Compel Satisfaction of Judgment and To Assess Interest against Defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Payton v. Colar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.