Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 SO2D 791 - Perkins v. State

Perkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
3
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State (1995), Brooks v. State (1990)

56 state decisions

2901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · 462 So. 2d 710 - Gilliard v. State · 434 So. 2d 212 - Smith v. State · 483 So. 2d 343 - Odom v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must allege matters [regarding ineffective assistance] with specificity and detail.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to prevail on the merits of such a claim, Perkins must show, first, that his counsel's performance was deficient and, second, that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense so as to deprive him of a fair trial. (citations omitted). To get a hearing he must allege these matters with specificity and detail.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is axiomatic that statutes of limitations may not be made retroactive to the prejudice of a party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.