Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Telfaire · 392 So. 2d 1274 - Watson v. State · 392 So. 2d 1280 - Sanders v. State · Garner v. State · 434 So. 2d 864 - Coots v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court may, at its discretion, at any time before the conclusion of the argument, when it appears to be necessary to the due administration of justice, allow a party to supply an omission in the testimony on such terms and under such limitations as the court may prescribe.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LaFontaine v. State“'Let the record reflect, please, that the defendant has been identified'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.