Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 So. 2d 999 - Page v. State

487 So. 2d 999 - Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2012

23 state decisions

1201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. United States · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Morris v. State · Bridges v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A verdict of conviction will not be set aside on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence, unless, allowing all reasonable presumptions for its correctness, the preponderance of the evidence against the verdict is so decided as to clearly convince this court that it was wrong and unjust. Johnson v. State, 378 So.2d 1173 (Ala.1979); Duncan v. State, 436 So.2d 883 (Ala.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1047 , 104 S.Ct. 720 , 79 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"No judgment may be reversed or set aside . . . on the ground of . . . the improper admission or rejection of evidence, nor for error as to any matter of pleading or procedure, unless in the opinion of the court to which the appeal is taken or application is made, after an examination of the entire cause, it should appear that the error complained of has probably injuriously affected substantial rights of the parties. " (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Requested charges must be considered in the light of, or in connection with, all other charges given by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.