Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 S.W.2d 104 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1991

7 state decisions

60197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Beto · Steel v. State · Ferrell v. State · Russell v. State · Lawson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The record has been carefully examined and we cannot conclude that there was ineffective assistance of counsel. This record does not support or reflect any willful misconduct by an employed counsel without the appellant’s knowledge which amounts to a breach of the legal duty of an attorney. Further, counsel not being court appointed, any incompetency or lack of effective assistance on the part of such counsel cannot be imputed to the State.” (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.