Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 S.W.2d 713 - Robinson v. Robinson

Robinson v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Brown v. McLennan County Children's Protective Services (1982), Rogers v. Rogers (1978)

57 state decisions

23019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Victory v. Hamilton · Harris v. Lebow · Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Burgess · State v. Ripke · Strode v. Srygley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [I]f an appellant exercises due diligence, and through no fault of his own is unable to obtain a proper record of the evidence introduced, this may require a new trial where his right to have the case reviewed on appeal can be preserved in no other way.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ . . .It does not appear that any request was made for the court reporter to record the testimony of the third witness or that any objection was made to his failure to do so. In our opinion the hearing of testimony in the presence of counsel for all parties but while one of the parties and the court reporter are absent is not so fundamentally erroneous or unfair as to require a reversal in the absence of objection or exception.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““(d) ... If any difference arises as to whether the record truly discloses what occurred in the trial court, or if the opposing party fails to agree or to disagree within ten days after being furnished with a copy of the proposed statement of facts, the matter shall be submitted to and settled by the trial court or judge thereof and the statement of facts shall be by him made to conform to the truth.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.