Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

487 S.W.3d 504

Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 2016

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2016-04-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2016

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-04-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2Foster filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because his trial counsel promised him that he would receive a sentence of no more than ten years by pleading guilty. The motion court denied Foster’s motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. Finding no clear error, we affirm.

¶3The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not cleaiiy erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/487/sw3d/504 · .json · Public domain