Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 SW3D 661 - State v. Velasquez

State v. Velasquez’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Guzman v. State · Calloway v. State · State v. Moff · Reyna v. State · Granados v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Based on a plain reading of article 28.01, we conclude the trial court erred by proceeding with the pre-trial motion to suppress hearing without notice to the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The amount of deference appellate courts afford a trial court's rulings depends upon which 'judicial actor' is better positioned to decide the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The request for a hearing was never urged by Velasquez and the motion was never set for a hearing by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.