Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 487 U.S. 392 - Sheridan v. United States

Sheridan v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

542
cited by 542 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

135 federal appellate · 102 district · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 542 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Chapman v. United States (1991), Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. (1988)

135 federal appellate · 102 district · 61 state decisions

187019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSheridan v. United States (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Cort v. Ash · Indian Towing Company v. United States · Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · United States v. Muniz · United States v. Shearer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 542 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “entirely independent of Carr's employment status.”
    37 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not merely bar claims for assault or battery; in sweeping language it excludes any claim arising out of assault or battery.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “that the [g]overnment was negligent in the supervision or selection of the employee and that the intentional tort occurred as a result,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.