Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 A2D 1365 - Singleton v. United States

Singleton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2015

14 state decisions

601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Doyle v. Ohio · Harrington v. California · United States v. Hasting · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Silence in the wake of these warnings may be nothing more than the arrestee’s exercise of these Miranda, rights. Thus, every post-arrest silence is insolubly ambiguous because of what the State is required to advise the person arrested. Moreover, while it is true that the Miranda warnings contain no express assurance that silence will cany no penalty, such assurance is implicit to any person who receives the warnings. In such circumstances, it would be fundamentally unfair and a deprivation of due process to allow the arrested person’s silence to be used to impeach an explanation subsequently offered at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1) that defendant assaulted complainant, and 2) at the time of the assault, 'the defendant acted with specific intent to commit the offense of robbery upon the complainant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.