Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.2d 1215 - Hartmann v. Scott

Hartmann v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.2d 1215 · 1973

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2017
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay (1978), Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted Gest (1976)

21 federal appellate · 2 district ·

18019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Haines v. Kerner · Monroe v. Pape · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Johnson v. Avery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the denial of the request for a three-judge court in the absence of a final order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(w)here the effect of a district court's order, if not reviewed, is the death knell of the action, review should be allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.