← 488 F.2d 1315 - John M. Cleary v. O. Roy Chalk

John M. Cleary v. O. Roy Chalk’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.2d 1315 · 1973

Citation profile

cited by 31 later decisions

cited 2 times by the Supreme Court

states following

September 1984

most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 12 (§ 1 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 20 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 294

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United States v. American Trucking Associations · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“No common carrier .engaged in commerce shall have any dealings in securities, supplies, or other articles of commerce, or shall make or have any contracts for construction or maintenance of any kind, to the amount of more than $50,000, in the aggregate, in any one year, with another corporation, firm, partnership, or association when the said common carrier shall have upon its board of directors or as its president, manager, or as its purchasing or selling officer, or agent in the particular transaction, any person who is at the same time a director, manager, or purchasing or selling officer of, or who has any substantial interest in, such other corporation, firm, partnership, or association, unless and except such purchases shall be made from, or such dealings shall be with, the bidder whose bid is the most favorable to such common carrier, to be ascertained by competitive bidding under regulations to be prescribed by rule or otherwise by the Interstate Commerce Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 427 F. Supp. 1157 - Rea Express, Inc. v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad
“We have no doubt that a consumer of service who is illegally overcharged sustains a property injury no less than a consumer of goods.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
“`[a] person whose property is diminished by a payment of money wrongfully induced is injured in his property,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 156 N.J. Super. 365 - Nj Chiropractic Soc. v. Radiological Soc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.