Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.2d 454 - Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,322 Fred Danford v. Albert E. Schwabacher, Jr.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,322 Fred Danford v. Albert E. Schwabacher, Jr.’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.2d 454 · 1974

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp. (1988), Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp. (1983)

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

340197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77L (§ 12 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 9 U.S.C. § 3

Relies on Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger · Enelow v. New York Life Insurance · Shanferoke Coal Supply Corporation v. Westchester Service Corporation · Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) the action in which the motion for a stay was made could have been maintained as an action at law before the merger of law and equity, and (b) the stay was sought to permit prior determination of an equitable defense or counterclaim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “grant or denial of a stay of an action pending arbitration ... is not a 'final decision' appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a remnant from the jurisprudential attic.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.