Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.2d 527 - Di Giorgio v. Causey

Di Giorgio v. Causey’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.2d 527 · 1973

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
July 2025
most recently cited

35 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably The Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, the Cross-Florida Canal Association v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, Eleanor H. Miller v. Avery S. Fullerton, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, J. G. Perko v. The Canal Authority of the State of Florida, Etc. (1974), Henry v. First National Bank (1979)

35 federal appellate ·

230197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perry v. Perry · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc. · DeBremaecker v. Short · Blackshear Residents Organization v. Romney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[n]o attention is paid to the merits of the controversy beyond that necessary to determine the presence or absence of an abuse of discretion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an appeal from the issuance or denial of a preliminary injunction is ordinarily no way to obtain appellate disposition of a case on its merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e note that while such appeals are pending the general tendency is to allow the case on the merits to lie dormant. Then, after the lapse of considerable time, it is found that two appeals are required for the disposition of the case. This causes frustration attributed to judicial delays, when the fault lies not with the judiciary, beleagured though it is by an unprecedented torrent of cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.