United States v. Olvera’s Empirical Analysis
488 F.2d 607 · 1973
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 1996
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Hockenberry v. United States · Kniess v. United States · Dunaway v. United States · Moorman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded for entry of a new judgment imposing sentence under the federal statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.