Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.2d 781 - United States v. McGhee

United States v. McGhee’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.2d 781 · 1974

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably McGhee v. Hanberry (1979), United States v. Alessandrello (1980)

26 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

1801974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2118 (Controlled Substance Registrant Protection Act of 1984)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Russell v. United States · United States v. Jackson · Hagner v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an individual or individuals (2) used force and violence or intimidation (3) to take or attempt to take (4) from the person or presence of another (5) money, property, or anything of value (6) belonging to or in the care, custody, control, management, or possession (7) of a bank, credit union, or savings and loan association.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The fundamental purpose of the pleading is to inform the defendant of the charges so that he may prepare his defense, and the test for sufficiency ought to be whether it is fair to defendant to require him to defend on the basis of the charge as stated in the particular indictment or information. The stated requirement that every ingredient or essential element of the offense should be alleged must be read in the light of the fairness test just suggested. [Footnotes omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.