Madeley v. Kern’s Empirical Analysis
488 F.2d 865 · 1974
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1992
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Craig v. State · Simon Johnson v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida · Hargrett v. Wainwright · Burroughs v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c] onsiderations of comity, as well as our desire to avoid piecemeal litigation, dictate that federal courts not consider petitions for writ of habeas corpus until all issues raised therein have been presented to the state court. Federal consideration of the merits of [a] petition should therefore be deferred until all issues raised have been presented to the Texas courts. (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jenke v. Heard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.