State National Bank of El Paso v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
488 F.2d 890 · 1974
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably In re Smith Corset Shops, Inc. (1982), Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (1999)
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Indrelunas · Hamilton v. Nakai · Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co. · Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry Mfg. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] judgment is effective only when so set forth and when entered as provided in Rule 79(a).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Judicial Conference of the United States, Report of Proposed Amendments to Certain Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts, 31 F.R.D. 621 , 650 (1962). Likewise Professor Moore interprets `separate document' to mean ` separate from an opinion or memorandum of the court.' 6A Moore's Federal Practice [paragraph] 58.01 [1.-2] at 58-14. See 11 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2785 at 14." (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"We have every reason to believe that a mechanical application of Rule 58 requires district judges to enter their judgments in one document and opinions in another. In its note following the proposed (1963) amendment to Rule 58 the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules described problems caused by parties' inability to tell that a judgment has been entered and assessed the amendment's contribution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.