Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.2d 929 - Donald Dee Collier v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Donald Dee Collier v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.2d 929 · 1974

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 1994 · most notably Potts v. Zant (1981), 183 Wis. 2d 587 - State Ex Rel. Flores v. State (1994)

28 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

270197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Anders v. California · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Fay v. Noia · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “either suggested, acquiesced in or concurred with the decision to dismiss the appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “some responsible state official was or should have been cognizant of both his desire to appeal and his inability to afford to do so . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]aiver of the fundamental right to appeal requires knowing and intelligent participation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.