Carnes’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP · Thomas v. City of Tacoma · Duchek v. Jacobi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because their right to recover post-judgment attorney fees is dependent on [ CCP § 685.040 ], the Carneses were required to comply with the timeliness requirements for post-judgment attorney fee motions set forth in the [California Enforcement of Judgments Law].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The judgment creditor may claim costs authorized by [ CCP §] 685.040 by noticed motion. The motion shall be made before the judgment is satisfied in full, but not later than two years after the costs have been incurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is entitled to the reasonable and necessary costs”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.