Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.3d 1197 - Taylor v. Westly

Taylor v. Westly’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.3d 1197 · 2007

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably García-Rubiera v. Calderón (2009), Griffin v. Bierman (2008)

10 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

150200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Jones v. Flowers · John Armstrong v. Gray Davis, Governor of the State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the traditional test, a plaintiff must show: (1) a strong likelihood of success on the merits, (2) the possibility of irreparable injury to plaintiff if preliminary relief is not granted, (3) a balance of hardships favoring the plaintiff, and (4) advancement of the public interest (in certain cases). The alternative test requires that a plaintiff demonstrate either a combination of probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury or that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in his favor.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.