Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.3d 411 - Van Hook v. Anderson

Van Hook v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.3d 411 · 2007

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
6
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Lindh v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, courts must determine whether the accused actually invoked his right to counself.] Second, if the accused invoked his right to counsel, courts may admit his responses to further questioning only on finding that he (a) initiated further discussions with the police, and (b) knowingly and intelligently waived the right he had invoked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.