Davis International, LLC v. New Start Group Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
488 F.3d 597 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp. · Pt United Can Company Ltd v. Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc W · Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc. · Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court reaches its decision with some regret because it is convinced, as is the Chancery Court, that the plaintiffs are attempting to subvert the removal statute by splitting their claims. The court is also convinced that, absent an injunction, the plaintiffs will continue to file this action and take up the time and resources of another court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.