Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 F.3d 756 - Reynolds v. Jamison

Reynolds v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis

488 F.3d 756 · 2007

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Williamson v. Curran (2013), Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance Service (2009)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

370200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Heck v. Humphrey · Allen v. McCurry · Beck v. State of Ohio · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he existence of probable cause and a finding of guilt are two distinct issues. Because [the plaintiff] did plead guilty to making a threatening phone call to [the victim], it is tempting to say, ex ante, that [the officer’s] belief that [the plaintiff] had committed the offense of telephone harassment must have been reasonable. However, there is no evidence that [the plaintiffs] guilty plea established what [the officer] knew at the time of the arrest — the relevant time period for the probable cause analysis. Thus, we decline to conclude that [the plaintiffs] § 1983 claim is barred by collateral estoppel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.