Moore v. Ballone’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2012
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois · Brewer v. Williams · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The] nature of the interrogator, the nature and condition of the suspect, the time and length of the questioning, the nature of the questioning — accusatory or investigatory, the focus of the investigation at the time of the questioning, and the place of interrogation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“You tell me what happened. We're tired of messing around here now. We're ready to go home. Tell me what happened so you can go home too.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Ballone“Well, come on and tell me about it then and we'll go.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Ballone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.