Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 N.E.2d 716 - Bailey v. Martz

Bailey v. Martz’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Habig v. Bruning (1993), Lucas v. Dorsey Corp. (1993)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 127 Ind. App. 149 - HAHN v. Moore · City of Evansville v. Blue · Kelsay v. Consolidated Rail Corp. · Penwell v. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. · Smith v. Diamond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[C]hildren under the age of 7 years are conclusively presumed to be incapable of being contributorily negligent, from 7 to 14 a rebuttable presumption exists they may be guilty thereof, and over 14, absent special circumstances, they are chargeable with exercising the standard of care of an adult."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(elven when he justifiably withdraws a lawyer should protect the welfare of his client by giving due notice of his withdrawal, suggesting employment of other counsel, delivering to the client all papers and property to which the client is entitled, cooperating with counsel subsequently employed, and otherwise endeay-oring to minimize the possibility of harm."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[iln the age seven to fourteen category, Indiana applies the Restatement standard and ascertains whether the child exercised the care under the cireumstances of a child of like age, knowledge, judgment, and experience.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.