Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1977
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lawson v. State · Engst v. State · Hazlewood v. Oklahoma City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We further held in Engst v. State, Okl.Cr., 474 P.2d 966 , that where hearsay testimony is improperly admitted not determinative of defendant’s guilt, but of such a nature as may have prejudiced the jury in the rendering of the punishment, it will be considered by this Court as grounds for modification.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.