¶1This case presents the same issue as that presented to this court in Spiegel v. State, 356 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 891 (Fla.1978), and we affirm on that authority.
¶2Because neither appellant nor appellee gave us the benefit of Spiegel, we invite them to review Glassalum Engineering Corp. v. 392208 Ontario Ltd., 487 So.2d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA, opinion filed this date), and to mind their p’s and q’s.
¶3Affirmed.