488 So. 2d 228 - State v. Esprinal’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Harris · Pool v. Kemper Insurance Group · 387 So. 2d 75 - State, in Interest of Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At a probation hearing, a violation of the probation conditions may be shown by establishing a criminal conviction or by actual proof of the commission of a crime apart from the conviction. When the state does not prove that the defendant was convicted of a crime which would be a basis for revocation, it must present actual proof that the defendant engaged in such criminal conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.