488 So. 2d 574 - Feldman v. Glucroft’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · 476 So. 2d 657 - Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc. · Dade County Med. Ass'n v. Hlis · The Time Publishing Co. v. Rowland · 453 So. 2d 123 - PARKWAY GENERAL HOSP., INC. v. Allinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e think it clear from the Holly case, particularly when read in the light of Justice Shaw's dissenting opinion which does directly treat the point that the language of the statute creates an absolute privilege and means that any existing defamation action has been totally abolished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Does section 768.40(4) totally abolish a defamation claim arising in proceedings before medical review committees? (2) If so, is section 768.40(4) invalid as in conflict with Article I, section 21, Florida Constitution?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.