Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

488 So. 2d 626

488 So.2d 626

11 Fla.L.Weekly 1125

Digangi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-05-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1989

1 state decisions

Relies on 444 So. 2d 947 - Jenkins v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-05-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery and grand theft. He contends the trial court erred in imposing fines, restitution, and a public defender’s fee when he was indigent. The State concedes that the case must be remanded for a determination of appellant’s ability to pay. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Furthermore, the trial court should also correct the conflict between the oral pronouncement at sentencing and the trial court’s written order regarding the fine in Count II.

¶2REMANDED FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT HEREWITH.

DOWNEY, WALDEN, and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
/488/so2d/626 · .json · Public domain