488 So. 2d 632 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · State v. Bussey · 428 So. 2d 327 - Sherman v. E.V. Smith Co. · 439 So. 2d 306 - Puzzo v. State · 374 So. 2d 1381 - State v. Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is unlawful for any person to agree, consent, or in any manner offer to unlawfully sell to any person a controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03 and then sell to such person any other substance in lieu of such controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“h[e]ld that because the sale was not completed, there being an absence of payment by the officer to the defendant, an essential element of the crime was lacking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e believe there was no intent by the [Supreme C]ourt [of Florida in State v. Bussey, supra ] to change the plain meaning of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.