Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 SW2D 193 - Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Davis

Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably State v. Higgins (1979), Hughes v. Whitmer (1983)

85 state decisions

25019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co · Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros. · American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States · King v. Priest · Borden Company v. Thomason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]ules and regulations are to be sustained unless unreasonable and plainly inconsistent with the act, and they are not to be overruled except for weighty reasons. The burden is upon those challenging the rules to show that they bear no reasonable relationship to the legislative objective. The interpretation and consti'uction of a statute by an agency charged with its administration is entitled to great weight. Administrative rules should be reviewed in light of the evil they seek to cure and are not unreasonable merely because they are burdensome.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so at odds with fundamental principles as to be mere whim or caprice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.