Vardas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Pate v. Robinson · Townsend v. State · Morales v. State · Monckton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Even where no request or demand is made for a preliminary hearing but evidence as to the accused’s present incompetence becomes sufficiently manifest during the trial on the merits, then due process of law would require the trial judge to halt the trial and conduct a hearing on that issue on his own initiative before proceeding further. . . . ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““If the only procedure available to an accused is to have the issue of competency to stand trial (present insanity) submitted to the jury along with the conditional submission of guilt or innocence, might not the jury reach an unanalytical and impressionistic verdict as to competency based on all they had heard ? ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perryman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.